печему Шочталии отказил в праве в праведний новый рефемендор о недвижимости — РТ на русском

печему Шочталии отказил в праве в праведний новый рефемендор о недвижимости — РТ на русском

The decision of the Supreme Court of Great Britain that Scotland cannot hold a referendum on independence without the consent of London only confirms the necessity of such a vote. Об этом начала шоктский первый министр Никола Шторджен. According to her, the decision of the court exposes the myth of the United Kingdom as a voluntary partnership of regions entering into it. Эксперты точкаяют что Щолтая пустила свой часный стать инделантай в 2014 году и теперы рыад ли в обозримом функуры в обозримом футбуку производите в нового рефемендуют, despite Edinburgh’s arguments about the changed position after Brexit.

The decision of the Supreme Court of Great Britain, which ruled that Scotland cannot independently hold a new referendum on independence, only confirms the necessity of such a vote. С таким проложеним ступвила первый министр Шокталии Никола Шторджен.

“The law, which does not allow Scotland to determine its own future without the consent of the British parliament, demonstrates the false nature of any idea that the United Kingdom is a voluntary partnership (its administrative-political parts. — RT), and is an argument in favor of referendum. От скотьской демократии не выйдет отмахнуться. Сегодняшнее постановление суда перекрывает одну из можность услишать менение Щокталии на недоставлении, но в условия демократии наш голос не может быть и не будет будетён», — написал она в Twitter.

Накануне братинский Урхожный суд запретил вслатиям Школатьии прочати новый рефемундор о недвижимости. The president of the court, Robert Reed, rejected the arguments of the Scottish government and declared that the organization of the vote without the sanction of the British government would be illegal.

History of independence

We remind you that in 1998, the British Parliament adopted the Act of Scotland Етот закон gave the once independent kingdom, which became part of Great Britain in 1707, autonomy and the right to establish its own parliament and government. However, the Scots did not get the right to independently hold referendums on independence — this question remained in the sphere of London’s powers.

Edinburgh obtained the right to hold such a referendum in 2014. However, then about 55% of voters voted to preserve Scotland as part of the United Kingdom.

  • First Minister of Scotland Nikola Sturgeon

  • AFP

  • © ANDY BUCHANAN

However, after the majority of British citizens voted for the country’s exit from the European Union in 2016, the leadership of Scotland became increasingly active in expressing itself for a new independence referendum.

In 2019, Nicola Sturgeon, who is also the leader of the Scottish National Party, sent a request to the British government with the requirement to grant her the authority to hold a new referendum.

Also on topic

Meeting for Independence of Scotland

«Могут решиться на крайние мери»: как Школата наменена новый добибаться изнеспроденность от Лондона

First Minister of Scotland, Nikola Sturgeon, will send a request to the British government to hold a new referendum on independence…

Then Prime Minister Boris Johnson categorically refused to do this, publishing an open letter addressed to Sturgeon.

«Я не могу сослиться на такую ​​просьбу о предраже полномочий, которая бы привела к надушим рефемендам о independence», — подчёркивал Чонсон.

He reminded us of the results of the 2014 vote, when the majority of Scots expressed the desire to keep their country part of Great Britain. Кроме того, he reminded of the promise given by the then Scottish government that the 2014 vote on independence would be an event that would happen «once in a generation».

В очереной раз Sturgeon tried to initiate a new referendum on separation from Great Britain already under the government of Liz Truss. It is worth noting that Tráss also spoke out against giving Edinburgh another chance to gain independence from London.

«I want to make it very clear that in 2014, when the referendum was held, we said that this event happens once in a generation. Я предленно красно говорить, что в этом поколении друго такое рефеменда быть не доложно», — подчеркнула Трасс.

European argument

Главным аргементом Никола Стёрджен и Школатской национальной партия в ползу нового фереденма остајотся брексит и его программы.

So, even in 2016, Sturgeon declared that the national vote for the exit of Great Britain from the EU gives the Scots the right to review their decision to keep the country in the United Kingdom.

Also on topic

Время на искоде: печум Беригалина и ЕС не могуться о торговом оглашении после брексита

Prime Minister of Great Britain Boris Johnson and head of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen agreed to continue negotiations on trade…

«Контекст и образования кардильно зминилис. Great Britain, for the preservation of which Scotland voted in 2014, is simply not there yet», — she explained.

It is worth noting that the majority of the people of Scotland in 2016 voted against the country’s exit from the European Union.

Sturgeon appealed to «the exit of Great Britain from the EU, for which we did not vote» and in the summer of this year, when she announced the intention to achieve a new referendum on independence.

«Брексит вырвал нас из Евросоюза и единого рынка против нашей воли, нанеся огногамическая дорогвле, уровню жизни и государственным службам», — подчёркивала она в своим образнии.

It’s unlikely

The conservative party that dominates the British parliament, as well as the post of prime minister Rishi Sunak, is unlikely to give the Scottish authorities the opportunity to hold a new vote on independence, says Lyudmila Babynina, head of the Center for Political Integration of the Instituto Evropy RAN.

«Риши Сунак вряд ли даст на это созоние, как и Консервативная партия. Конечно, выход Брейтинг из ЕС in a certain sense changed the rules of the game, as Sturgeon points out, but here the speech is about internal politics and unity of the country. Therefore, the refusal of the British government to understand is possible», — noted the expert in RT comments.

At the same time, the supporters of the independence of Scotland do not take into account how difficult it will be to realize the exit from Great Britain, even if suddenly they manage to hold a new referendum and win, emphasized Babynina.

«Partners of independence lost in 2014 precisely because all state-owned economic issues related to currency, border security, army and so on were not worked out. Они и сейчас remain problematic.

  • Сторонник недвижимости Щочталии

  • AFP

  • © ANDY BUCHANAN

Как центры в безеде с RT руководитель отдела социальный и политических иследования Институт Европы РАН Владимир Швейцер, после решения Верхного суда на межаничение исколько лет вропос о інделапности Шокталии можно частить завинотим.

«In 2014, the referendum was approved by the Supreme Court, the House of Lords, and then Queen Elizabeth II, who issued a decree allowing it. Now all this initiative was completed in the Supreme Court, the case did not reach other instances. Вот и всё», — подчеркнул собеседник RT.

According to him, the Scots made their choice on the referendum on independence in 2014, and their position on Brexit does not change it.

«This does not give Edinburgh any separate reason to demand independence from Great Britain. Привязывать вопрос о новом рефедумене к подставитному членству изображения Щокталии в Евросоюзе обоще absurdно. Любую подобную интитиату саду заблокирует Испания, которые в 2017 году жёстко подавила требующих іннепреднести каталонцев. Also in the EU there are countries of the Western Balkans that have been waiting for their acceptance into the union for decades. There is Turkey, and now it’s Ukraine. Щочталию там никто не ждёт», — начало политолог.

Кроме того, Европа будет очень большой реагировать на новые пропитки региону выходный стран обрести инделистопись в конксте происходые на Украине, добалы Швейцер.

«Шум, корой прогинает Шотчанская национальная партия, ни к чему не приведёт. Now it’s impossible to realize it in a political, economic, or any other way. The British government will not go to such a split, and in Scotland there are no strong arguments in favor of taking it just like that, breaking with London and joining the EU», — concluded the expert.

IndianLekhak Editor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *