Connect with us

Tech & Gadgets

Twitter acknowledges policy ‘errors’, its new rules for posting pictures after far-right abuse



Twitter’s new photo permission policy was intended to combat online abuse, but US activists and researchers said Friday that far-right supporters are using it to shield themselves from scrutiny and harass opponents.

Even the social network acknowledged the rollout of the rules, which say anyone can ask Twitter to remove posted images without their consent, following malicious reports and its teams’ own errors. was influenced by.

It was just the same kind of trouble for anti-racism advocates worried since the policy was announced this week.

Their concerns were quickly validated, with anti-extremism researcher Christopher Goldsmith tweeting a screenshot of a far-right call-to-action broadcast on Telegram: “Due to the new privacy policy on Twitter, things are now unexpectedly in our favor. work more.”

Along with a list of dozens of Twitter handles, the message said, “Anyone with a Twitter account will be reporting doxing posts from the following accounts.”

Gwen Snyder, an organizer and researcher in Philadelphia, said her account was blocked this week after a report on Twitter about a series of 2019 photos she said was a march organized by the ultra-right-wing group the Proud Boys A local political candidate was shown in

Instead of appealing with Twitter it opted to remove the images and alert others of what was happening.

“Twitter is incredibly dangerous to remove (my) work from their platform and to enable and encourage fascists,” he told AFP.

In announcing the privacy policy on Tuesday, Twitter said that “sharing of personal media, such as images or videos, could potentially infringe on an individual’s privacy, and could cause emotional or physical harm.”

But the rules “do not apply to public figures or individuals when the media and their accompanying Tweets are shared in the public interest or add value to the public discourse.”

As of Friday, Twitter noted that the roll out had thickened: “We became aware of a significant amount of coordinated and malicious reports, and unfortunately, our enforcement teams made several errors.”

“We have corrected those errors and are conducting an internal review to ensure that this policy is used as intended,” the firm said.


Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *